( POSSIBLE ) ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE FOR THE EARLIEST EXTANT CHRISTIAN REFERENCE TO BELIEF IN THE RESURRECTION & THE USE OF THE ( TETRAGRAMMATON ) BY CHRISTIANS
A
tomb in Jerusalem was discovered in 1973 when some apartment blocks
were being prepared to be built. It was briefly (but not thoroughly)
excavated in 1981, then resealed because of protests by
Ultra-Orthodox Jews. It is dated as being typical of a Jewish tomb
from somewhere between 20-70 C.E. Between 2009-2011 it was reexamined
by means of a robotic camera and it was discovered that it is most
likely to be a VERY EARLY CHRISTIAN TOMB.
What
is so remarkable about that?
They
found inscriptions (one possible, the other definite) with:
GREEK TRANSLITERATIONS OF
THE [Heb., ( יהוה )] TETRAGRAMMATON
THE [Heb., ( יהוה )] TETRAGRAMMATON
- Gk., ( ΠΙΠΙ ) = possible
- Gk., ( ΙΑΙΟ ) = definite
JAMES
D. TABOR: “...2.
Ossuary 2:2=Kloner 2:1.
This ossuary is highly decorated on its front side with deeply carved
rosettes and frieze border. The sides and back of the ossuary are
plain. It has an odd incised marking in the upper right corner of
the decorated front: a stick- like “animal” figure with four
legs, head, and tail, though we were not certain of that
identification (Fig. 17). WE ALSO CONSIDERED IT MIGHT BE A
REPRESENTATION OF THE DIVINE NAME, Yod, Heh, Vav, Heh ( YAHWEH ) [
JEHOVAH
] WRITTEN
IN EITHER STYLIZED HEBREW OR GREEK: ( יהוה
)
= ΠΙΠΙ.{26}
IF SUCH IS THE CASE IT MIGHT SHED LIGHT ON THE GREEK INSCRIPTION ON
OSSUARY 5:3, LINE 2, THAT WE THINK HAS THE DIVINE NAME WRITTEN IN THE
GREEK LETTERS ( ΙΑΙΟ ). IF SO WE HAVE SOMETHING UNIQUE AND
HIGHLY IRREGULAR AS THERE ARE NO EXAMPLES OF JEWISH INSCRIPTIONS FROM
THIS PERIOD IN JERUSALEM THAT WRITE OUT THE DIVINE NAME YAHWEH [ JEHOVAH ].{27}
We have to assume that such a practice, particularly in a tomb,
which was considered tum’a—that
is, ritually unclean —is heterodox, reflecting a sectarian
perspective (Numbers 19:16).{28}...”
- (Pages 12-13;
Sub-Section: 2. Ossuary 2:2=Kloner 2:1; Subheading: The Ossuaries and
their Inscriptions ; “A Preliminary Report of a Robotic Camera,
Exploration of a Sealed 1st
Century Tomb in East Talpiot, Jerusalem,” By James D. Tabor,
University of North Carolina at Charlotte jdtabor@uncc.edu.)
[FOOTNOTE
26]: Certain ancient versions of the Greek Old Testament (e.g.,
Origen's Hexapla, the Greek versions of Aquila, Symmachus, and some
manuscripts of the LXX represented the Hebrew divine name, Yod Heh
Vav Heh in Hebrew letters which were read by the uninitiated to look
like the Greek letters Pi, Iota, Pi, Iota —thus ( ΠΙΠΙ or PIPI
).
[FOOTNOTE
27]: Cotton, et al., CIIP is the latest published survey of 692
known inscriptions.
[FOOTNOTE
28]: See Sanhedrin 10:1; Tosefta Sanhedrin 12:9: “...All Israel
are worthy of the world to come. [...] and those are not: he who
argues that the resurrection in not in the Torah and that the Torah
is not from heaven and the Epikores. [...] Aba Shaul says: and he
who pronounces the Name by its letters...”
JAMES
D. TABOR: “...5.
Ossuary 5:3=Kloner 5:2.
This ossuary is has a highly ornamented f ront façade with twin
rosettes and an elaborate frieze border. In the narrow curved blank
space between the rosettes there is a four line Greek inscription
written in uncial letters ( Fig. 1 9 ). The final two letters of
line 4 are uncertain, both in their formation and due to the
limitations of remote autopsy by camera. […] ΔΙΟΣ is an adjective (masc. nom/voc. sing.) likely modifying what we take to be
the proper noun in line 2. It can be variously translated as
“heavenly,” “divine ” “wondrous”– but here in this
context it seems to clearly refer to God.{31} ( ΙΑΙΟ ) WE TAKE AS
A GREEK REPRESENTATION OR TRANSLITERATION OF THE TETRAGRAMMATON:
( יהוה
)
(Yod, Heh, Vav, Heh) —THAT IS YAHWEH [ JEHOVAH ]. It is unusual in
that it has four letters rather than the common three -letter form (
ΙΑΩ ).{32} Josephus says the divine name is represented by four
“vowels.”{33} It is possible that this writer intended it as a
precise transliteration —since the Hebrew name of God also has four
letters.{34} Accordingly, the inscription, though written in Greek
letters, is purposely bilingual—first a Greek representation of
God—the “Divine one,” followed by a Hebrew presentation —YAHWEH
[ JEHOVAH ]—but represented in Greek letters. ( ΥΨΩ ) is the
present indic. act. 1st person singular of the contract verb ΥΨΟΩ,
to “raise,” “lift up” or “exalt.” As literally written
it could then be translated “I DIVINE JEHOVAH RAISE UP” or “I
EXALT [YOU] O
DIVINE JEHOVAH” (taking ΔΙΟΣ as a vocative). […] IN THE NEW
TESTAMENT T HERE ARE MANY PASSAGES IN WHICH JESUS KNOWS, BEARS, AND
REVEALS GOD BY HIS “NAME” YAHWEH [ JEHOVAH ]—THAT IS THE FOUR -
LETTER TETRAGRAMMATON. […] If so this inscription would be a plea
to “God/Yahweh ,” called upon in bilingual fashion, to raise
someone up: “O DIVINE/GOD JEHOVAH, RAISE UP!{*}
[...] Much depends on the transcription of the last line with its
three letters since the final two
are difficult to read. If we take the final line as ΑΠΟ, that is,
the preposition “from,” it is possible that it might be an
abbreviated plea for resurrection “from [the dead]...” -
(Pages 14-17; Sub-Section: 5. Ossuary 2:2=Kloner 2:1; Subheading: The
Ossuaries and their Inscriptions ; “A Preliminary Report of a
Robotic Camera, Exploration of a Sealed 1st
Century Tomb in East Talpiot, Jerusalem,” By James D. Tabor,
University of North Carolina at Charlotte jdtabor@uncc.edu.)
[FOOTNOTE
31]: Liddel Scott, sv. Dios.
[FOOTNOTE
32]: There is an example ΙΑΙΟΩ
ref erring to “Baal” in a papyrus published by David R . Jordan,
“Notes from Carthage,” Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und
Epigraphik 111 (1996) 115 – 123. Other examples are: Diodorus
Siculus Ἰαῶ (Iao); Irenaeus says certain gnostics formed a
compound Ἰαωθ (Iaoth=related to Sabaoth?); Valentinians use Ἰαῶ
(Iao); Clement of Alexandria: Ἰαοὺ (Iaou) or Ἰαουέ
(Iaoue) and Origen of Alexandria, Ἰαῶ (Iao), see: Diodorus
Siculus, Histories. I, 94.; Irenaeus, Against Heresies II, xxxv, 3,
in P.G., VII, col. 840 and I, iv, 1, in P.G., VII, col. 481; Clement,
"Stromata", V, 6, in P.G., IX, col. 60; and
Origen,
"In John.", II, 1, in P .G., XIV, col. 105.
[FOOTNOTE
33]: Josephus, Wars 5.235.
[FOOTNOTE
34]: I thank R ichard Bauckham
f or t his point. He suggests that the first iota and the second one
are purposely written in a different style to represent the two
Hebrew letters Yod and Vav.
[PERSONAL
FOOTNOTE *]: In the context he proposes the theory that JHVH/YHWH
could refer to Jesus as JHVH/YHWH or Jesus as JHVH/YHWH's
representative. He also proposes that a carved image of a square box
with cross beams in it could be the earliest image of a
“cross” although, when one sees the entire carving, in it's full
picture context, it is highly obvious, and most likely just a picture
of some sort of building or hut structure with a window in it.
JAMES
D. TABOR: “...That, along with THE UNPRECEDENTED EXAMPLE OF
WRITING THE DIVINE NAME YAHWEH [ JEHOVAH ] IN GREEK LETTERS IN A
JEWISH TOMB—a place of tum’a or ritual defilement —argues for
a heterodox or sectarian context. The family buried in this tomb are
Jews to be sure, and the style of the tomb, the ornamentation's of the
ossuaries, and everything else about it is nothing out of the
ordinary —other than these semi- informal inscriptions of both
epitaph and icon...” - (Page 23, Subheading: Brief Concluding
Observations ; “A Preliminary Report of a Robotic Camera,
Exploration of a Sealed 1st Century Tomb in
East Talpiot, Jerusalem,” By James D. Tabor, University of North
Carolina at Charlotte jdtabor@uncc.edu.)
NOTE:
Emphasis is added to the text above by myself.
Counterfeit
(or Tri{3}nitarian) Christianity, which is the prevailing form in the
world today, which also consists of the majority of those who profess
to believe in Jesus and the God of the Bible, have claimed that the
earliest Christians didn't use the Divine Name or Tetragrammaton
JEHOVAH.
Slowly
but surely, archaeology, is ( perhaps ) proving this claim false.
SEE
ALSO THE LINKS BELOW: