TESTIMONY TO EARLY COUNCILS CONVENED CONCERNING THE MONTANTIST CONTROVERSY
The
Libellus Synodicus also called the Synodicon
FOR
GREEK TEXT SEE LINK BELOW:
LATIN
TEXT: “...Synodus divina & sancta particularis,
congregata a sanctissimo Achillarum episcopo Sota, aliisque duodecim
episcopis : quae refutatum Theodotum Coriarium abdicavit : Montantum
item cum Maximilla, qui octingentos septuaginta octo aeonas docebat,
seque ipsum pro Spiritu sancto venditabat...” - (Page 381,
ACHILLANA, SOTAE.)
LIBELLUS
SYNODICUS OR SYNODICON (circa. 8-9th Century
C.E.): “...A divine and partiularly sacred assembly, being
assembled by Sotas, a very holy overseer from Anchiallus, [along
with] twelve other overseers. Who refuted [and] extirpated
Theodotus{*} the tanner, who was teaching{*} [his]
eight hundred and seventy eight AEons, in addition [to him] Montanus
together with Maximilla, following after, ( Alas! ), repeatedly tried
to sell himself off as [being] the holy spirit...” - (
ACHILLANA, SOTAE
translated by Matt13weedhacker 14/08/12.)
[FOOTNOTE
*]: The writer of the Synodicon is generally believed to be
mistaken to which Theodotus is being reffered to. It is most likely
the Montanist Theodotus described in Eusebius Eccl. Hist. Book 5, Chapter
16.
[FOOTNOTE
*]: Ltn., ( docebat ) that is - in a cunning and
public manner, as if on a drama stage according to the
alternate Lexicon definitions.
LIBELLUS
SYNODICUS OR SYNODICON (circa. 8-9th Century
C.E.): “...A holy and particular Gk., ( merike ) synod,
assembled under the very holy Bishop Sotas of Anchialus (in Thrace,
on the Black Sea), and consisting of twelve other bishops, convicted
of heresy the currier Theodotus,{*} Montanus, and Maximilla, and
condemned them...”
[PERSONAL
FOOTNOTE *]: The writer of the
Synodicon is generally believed to be mistaken to which Theodotus is
being reffered to. It is most likely the Montanist Theodotus
described in Eusebius Eccl. Hist. Book 5, Chapter 16.
LATIN
TEXT: “...Synodus divina & sancta provincialis,
Hierapoli Asiae celebrata ab Apollinario sanctissimo hujus episcopo,
aliisque viginti sex episcopis : quae abdicavit & extirpavit
Montanum & Maximillam pseudoprophetas : qui blaspheme, utpote
a daemone obsessi, sicut idem Pater dicit, vitam commutarunt. Cum
iisdem vero & Theodotum Coriarium ( eadem Synodus )
condemnavit...” - (Page 381, HIERAPOLITANA, APOLLINARII.)
LIBELLUS
SYNODICUS OR SYNODICON (circa. 8-9th Century
C.E.): “...A provincial [yet] sacred and divine assembly, [was
held] at Hierapolis of [the disrict of] Asia, [convened] by an
overseer from this place, Apollinarius, [along with] twenty six other
overseers : who renounced and extirpated
the false prophets Montanus and Maximilla, seeing he was demon
possessed, as for example, he asserted that he was identical with the
Father, a substitute being. In truth they condemned along with him
also, ( at that same assembly ), Theodotus{*} the tanner...”
- (Page 381, “HIERAPOLITANA, APOLLINARII,” Translated by
Matt13weedhacker 14/08/12.)
[FOOTNOTE
*]: The writer of the Synodicon is generally believed to be
mistaken to which Theodotus is
being reffered to. It is most likely the Montanist Theodotus
described in Eusebius Eccl. Hist. Book 5, Chapter 16.
Tertullian confirms that there were many Councils or Synods held around the time of the Montantist controversy:
Tertullian confirms that there were many Councils or Synods held around the time of the Montantist controversy:
LATIN
TEXT: “...si non ab omni
concilio ecclesiarum, etiam uestrarum, inter apocrypha et
falsa iudicaretur, adultera et ipsa et inde patrona sociorum...” -
(Chapter X, 11(C)-13(A), Tertulliani Liber De Pudicitia Text edited
by Charles Munier, Sources Chrétiennes 394, 1993.)
POST-MONTANTIST
TERTULLIAN (circa. 185-225 C.E. ):
“...But I would yield my ground to you, if the
scripture of 'the Shepherd,'[118] which is the only one which
favours adulterers, had deserved to find a place in the Divine canon;
if it had not been habitually
judged by every council of Churches ( even
of your own ) among
apocryphal and false (writings); itself adulterous, and hence a
patroness of its comrades...” - (Chapter 10:12, “On Modesty,”
or “De Pudicitia,” Translated by the Rev. S. Thelwall, 1870.)
[FOOTNOTE
118]: i.e., the "Shepherd" of Hermas. See de Or., c.
xvi.
It is thought by some that the Muratorian Canon was perhaps a result of one of these Councils, and perhaps was drafted in reaction to the Psuedo-Revelations and writings being spread by the New Prophecy cult of Montanus:
Picture
of Page One of the Original Latin MSS Online:
Picture
of Page Two of the Original Latin MSS Online :
Picture
of Page Three of the Original Latin MSS Online :
ORIGINAL
LATIN TEXT: “...[43.] apocalapse etiam iohanis et petri
tantum recipimus quam quidam ex nostris legi in eclesia nolunt [44.]
pastorem uero nuperrim ettemporibus nostris in urbe
roma herma conscripsit sedente cathetra urbis romae aeclesiae pio eps
fratrer eius [45.] et ideo legi eum quide
oportet se puplicare uero in eclesia populo [46.] neque inter
profetas conpletum numero [47.] neque inter apostolos in fine
temporum potest. [48.] arsinoi autem seu ualentini. uel
mitiadis nihil in totum recipemus. [49.] qui etiam nouu
psalmorum librum marcioni conscripserunt una cum basilide assianom
catafry cum constitutorem...” - (Pages 106-113, “Theron in
Evidence of Tradition,”.)
RESTORED
OR CONJECTORED LATIN TEXT: “...[43.] apocalypses etiam
Iohannis, et Petri, tantum recipimus, quam quidam ex nostris legi in
ecclesia nolunt. [44.] Pastorem uero nuperrime temporibus
nostris in Urbe Roma Hermas conscripsit, sedente cathedra Urbis Romae
ecclesiae Pio Episcopo fratre eius; [45.] et ideo legi eum
quidem oportet, se publicare uero in ecclesia populo, [46.]
neque inter Prophetas, completum numero, [47.] neque inter
apostolos, in finem temporum potest. [48.] Arsinoi autem, seu
Ualentini, uel Mitiadis nihil in totum recipimus. [49.] qui
etiam nouum Psalmorum librum Marcioni concripserunt una cum Basilide
Assianum Catafrygum constitutorem...” - (Pages 106-113, “Theron
in Evidence of Tradition,”.)
RESTORED
OR CONJECTORED LATIN TEXT: “...[73.] tris legi in
eclesia nolunt pastorem vero [74.] nuperrim e temporibus
nostris in urbe [75.] roma herma conscripsit sedente cathe
[76.] tra urbis romae aecclesiae pio eps fratre [77.]
eius et ideo legi eum quide oportet se pu [78.] blicare vero
in eclesia populo neque inter [79.] profetas completum numero
neque inter [80.] apostolos in fine temporum potest [81.]
arsinoi autem seu valentini vel mitiadis [?] [82.] nihil in
totum recipemus qui etiam novu [83.] psalmorum librum marcioni
conscripse [84.] runt una cum basilide assianom catafry [85.]
cum constitutorem...” - (Pages 82-88. Henry M. Gwatkin, ed.,
Selections from Early Writers Illustrative of Church History to the
Time of Constantine London: MacMillan and co., 1937.)
MURATORIAN
FRAGMENT OR CANON (circa. 180 C.E.):
“...[73.]
But
Hermas wrote the Shepherd [74.]
very
recently, {7c}
in
our times, in the city of Rome, [75.]
while
bishop Pius, his brother, was occupying the [episcopal] chair [76.]
of
the church of the city of Rome. {7d}
[77.] And
therefore it ought indeed to be read; but [78.]
it
cannot be read publicly to the people in church either among [79.]
the
Prophets, whose number is complete, {8}
or
among [80.]
the
Apostles, for it is after [their] time. [81.]
But
we accept nothing whatever of Arsinous or Valentinus or Miltiades,
[82.] who
also composed [83.]
a
new book of psalms for Marcion, [84-5.]
together
with Basilides, the Asian founder of the Cataphrygians {8a}...”
- (Metzger's English translation, amended text,
edited by Hans Lietzmann, Das Muratorische Fragment und die
Monarchianischen Prologue zu den Evangelien, Kleine Texte, i; Bonn,
1902; 2nd ed., Berlin, 1933. Appendix IV of the same book pp. 305-7.
The Canon of the New Testament Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987.)
[FOOTNOTE
7c]: The Shepherd of Hermas is another work widely read in early
times. It is a kind of moral allegory, like Bunyan's Pilgrim's
Progress, but more impressive in that it purports to convey a series
of divine revelations. —M.D.M.
[FOOTNOTE
7d]: This would be Pius I, bishop of Rome from about 142 to 157.
—M.D.M.
[FOOTNOTE
8]: Perhaps the Fragmentist means that there are three major
Prophets and twelve minor Prophets.
[FOOTNOTE
8a]: The few words that follow this are unintelligible, and so
the fragment practically ends here. —M.D.M.
MURATORIAN
FRAGMENT OR CANON (circa. 180 C.E.): “...The Pastor, moreover,
did Hermas write very recently in our times in the city of Rome,
while his brother bishop Plus sat in the chair of the Church of Rome.
And therefore it also ought to be read; but it cannot be made
public{38} in the Church to the people, nor placed among the
prophets, as their number is complete, nor among the apostles to the
end of time. Of the writings of Arsinous, called also Valentinus, or
of Miltiades, we receive nothing at all. Those are rejected too who
wrote the new Book of Psalms for Marcion, together with Basilides and
the founder of the Asian Cataphrygians.{39}...” -
(Roberts-Donaldson Translation: Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 5, III. -
Canon Muratorianus.{22} In Muratori, V. C. Antiq. Ital. Med. oev.,
vol. iii. col. 854.)
[FOOTNOTE
38]: Reading "sed publicari" for "se publicare."
[ Vol. ii. p. 3.]
[FOOTNOTE
39]: [For remarks of my own on the Muratorian Canon, see vol. ii.
p. 56, this series.]
MURATORIAN
FRAGMENT OR CANON (circa. 180 C.E.): “...[44.] But
Hermas composed The Shepherd quite recently in our times in the city
of Rome, while his brother, Pius, the bishop, occupied the
[episcopal] seat of the city of Rome. [45.] And therefore, it
should indeed be read, but it cannot be published for the people in
the Church, [46.] neither among the Prophets, since their
number is complete, [47.] nor among the Apostles for it is
after their time (?). [48.] But we accept nothing at all of
Arsinoes, or Valentinus, or Metiades (?). [49.] Those also
[are rejected] who composed a new book of Psalms for Marcion together
with Basilides and the Cataphrygians of Asia (?)...” - (Pages
106-113, “Theron in Evidence of Tradition,”.)
MURATORIAN
FRAGMENT OR CANON (circa. 180 C.E.): “...But Hermas wrote the
Shepherd quite lately in our time in the city of Rome, when on the
throne of the church of the city of Rome the bishop Pius, his
brother, was seated. And therefore it ought indeed to be read, but it
cannot be read publicly in the Church to the other people either
among the prophets, whose number is settled, or among the
apostles to the end of time. But we accept nothing whatever from
Arsinous or Valentinus and Miltiades(?), who have also composed a new
psalm book for Marcion, together
with Basilides of Asia Minor, the founder of the Cataphrygians...”
- (Translated by Glenn Davis.)
MURATORIAN
FRAGMENT OR CANON (circa. 180 C.E.): “...But Hermas wrote "the
Shepherd" in the city of Rome most recently in our times, when
his brother bishop Pious was occupying the chair in the church at
Rome. And so indeed it ought to be read but that it be made public to
the people in the church and placed among the prophets whose number
is complete or among the apostles is not possible to the end of time.
Of Arsenus, Valentinus, or Miltiadees we receive nothing at all.
Those also who wrote the "new book of Psalms," Marcion
together with Basilides, and the Asian Cataphrigians...” -
(Translated by Kenneth Johnson.)
http://www.biblefacts.org/church/mcf.html
FEEL
FREE TO COMMENT
Members
comments and thoughts are always welcome.
Genuine
questions are always welcome.
Verbal
abuse of Jehovah's Witnesses is not welcome.
DISCLAIMER: THIS WEBSITE IS --- ( NOT ) --- AN OFFICIAL WEBSITE OF THE WATCHTOWER BIBLE AND TRACT SOCIETY This is a personal website that is not officially supported nor endorsed by the WBTS. The Watchtower Society cannot be held responsible or liable for the content found on this blog/website. Links are offered here for additional reading, however the manager of this site does not necessarily support every comment on all of these sites. You are invited to conduct your own research. To those who are not Jehovah's Witnesses, please remember that if you are looking for the authoritative information on beliefs, practices and news releases you should look to the source at http://www.watchtower.org/
Comments
Post a Comment